Google SQUALENE – it’s in the swine flu shot. Go have a look at what is going on in London around these mandatory swine flu shots. Wake up and smell the world de-population plan soon to be enacted on America by your friendly neighborhood federal government, fema, secretly federalized police who are now armed to the teeth with military salvage weaponry, the WHO agenda, and the CDC.

Can you think of a logical reason that the CDC in Atlanta needs to own a half million polyguard coffin liners housed at a REX 84 USA FEMA concentration camp in north Georgia? Can you think of a logical reason that Baxter International would patent a swine flu vaccine last year months before swine flu actually appeared as if by magic in Mexico?

Does it make sense to you that scientists have noted that the construction of the swine flu virus from a combined 3 or 4 other viruses, including the original Spanish flu strain from 1918, that had to be carved off an Inuit Eskimo’s cadaver tissue, making it quite apparent that the virus was actually concocted in a laboratory? A la Frankenstein science?

full article

The Prime Minister said the case raised a "number of issues", but claimed the public did not want the Home Secretary to get involved with all extradition requests from America.

The government is trying to force me to buy it, but absent federal meddling, the price of medical care would return to reasonable levels.

Politicians wishing to remain in office face two conflicting pressures. On the one hand, they need to secure contributions to fund their campaigns. This gives them the incentive to grant favors to interest groups, while ignoring the effect on the rest of us. One the other hand, they need to maintain the support of voters. This gives them the incentive not to do anything the median voter doesn’t like. This latter constraint doesn’t mean that policy will be good, only that it will be popular.

Sometimes, though, these two pressures pull politicians in the same direction. Some policies are popular with voters and enrich interest groups at the same time. When a potential policy has both a direct financial payoff to someone willing to reward helpful legislators and subsidize legislative effort, as well as some moral justification voters find compelling, it is much more likely to be enacted.

full article