Who Rules The World? - Part 2 - Philip Jones

From rense.com

Who Rules The World? - Part 2
The Origin Of Evil: Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-9-9

Introduction:

Following on from Part One, in this the second part in the series, we will attempt to establish whether the Satanic Bloodline survived the Great Flood, and if so how. Then in the Final Part, we will discover who and what the Illuminati is, and how it's `web` connects with that great and awful evil force whose influence appears to permeate all the institutions of our sad planet these days. Finally taking all we have discussed, we will decide as to whether the eternal adversary of God and man, the great deceiver, Lucifer/Satan, is indeed the driving force behind the creation of the World Tyranny which has been erected methodically and systematically around our lives.

To many orthodox Christians, some of the themes in this article will appear at the very least heretical, unscriptural and even shocking. But I have approached this series from the point of view of an investigator, not a theologian. As a former Police Officer with over twenty one years experience, I understand the need to examine all the evidence, no matter where it originates, with an open mind, and to only dismiss that which is found to be improbable, at the very least circumstantially improvable and ultimately erroneous. We are dealing with events in the far distant past, and much of the reference sources are contradictory, and biased towards one thesis or another. I have tried to avoid such bias, and as I have learnt over the past two years, the only thing which is carved in stone, is that carved which is carved in stone. So be of an open mind.

The theme of this article is whether there is a supernaturally evil force which with the aid of others like itself, it's blood kin, and it's disciples, is operating behind the scenes, manipulating world events, towards a definite goal; that being the creation of a World Dictatorship and earthly dominion. This is not a theological dissertation.

But before we can arrive at that point, we must traverse the `Flood.` Without proving that the Satanic Bloodline survived the deluge of water sent by God, then this hypothesis falls flat on it's face; so in order for that not to happen, it is to that one critical event we must now turn all our attention to, at least for the next few pages. So, to the evidence.

The Great Flood:

The Bible appears to tell us that the the flood destroyed not only the `Giants,` but also the entire line of Cain? That it was only Noah and his three sons who began the antediluvian age of mankind. But if we read Genesis Chapter Six and take it literally, then it seems to state clearly that there were also Nephilim, or their descendants at least, after the flood. Furthermore, the Book Of Jubilees [1] also tells us that the children of the Nephilim, known as the Anakim were not entirely annihilated by the flood, recounting how a remnant of that evil race of giants were spared, and that sometime after the waters had receded, Noah learned that these `evil spirits, born of the Fallen Angels were seducing and misleading his grandchildren, and even killing some of them.

{According to their own occult mythology, the Illuminati[2 ]represent the modern day descendants of the Fallen Angels, who their arcane mystery school doctrines claim also inhabited the mythical lost continent of Atlantis. Then, in succeeding generations following the great deluge and the `sinking` of Atlantis, their progeny the Anakim returned once again to haunt mankind.}

And what's more there is good reason to believe that the line of Cain also survived!

Let's Read on!

The Sumerian Flood Story:

The theme of a great and destructive flood is not unique to the Bible. Flood myths with many similarities to the Genesis account appear widely in subsequent Ancient Near Eastern mythologies: including the Atrahasis myth, the Utnapishtim episode in the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh[3], and the ancient Greeks also had a very similar flood myth. In all of these stories, deities (or a deity) create the animals and human beings, but people anger the god(s), so they decide to wipe out all of the people and animals with a flood. A divine being warns one pious person of the impending deluge and tells him to build a very large boat, and with it he preserves humankind, and usually the animals, from extinction. In the end the god(s) reward him for his actions.

In it's fully developed form, the Mesopotamian flood myth appears in the 'Epic of Gilgamesh,' one of the first literary masterpieces, which relates the adventures of a Hero-King of Sumer. The earliest versions of the epic derive from the first part of the second millennium BC (corresponding roughly with the time of the Biblical account). The story of the flood is told to Gilgamesh by Utnapishtim, the counterpart of Noah in the story. Advised by the god Ea (Enki) that his city is to be destroyed by flood, Utnapishtim is told to build a ship for his family, servants, and animals. After a seven-day deluge of heavenly waters, the vessel comes to rest on a mountaintop. The wrath of the gods has been appeased, and Utnapishtim and his wife are granted immortality.

Parallel legends were told in other parts of the Middle East at an early date. The Mesopotamian version was probably brought to Canaan, the land where the Israelites settled, by the patriarch Abraham, who hailed from Ur in what was at one time Sumer, and was subsequently transmitted down through Isaac, and Jacob. The original tale was undoubtedly reshaped many times, not least by the Sumerians and Akkadians themselves, to fit with their own pantheon. It is very likely also that later Hebrew writers did likewise.

As the similarities are obvious, some detractors from the Holy Scriptures feel this throws doubt on the validity of the Biblical account, inferring a form of religious plagiarising. We must remember that we are speaking about the same region here, and who is to say which version is more correct than the other. As I said above, people have a tendency to make the truth fit. I however take the view that the Sumerian legend corroborates the Biblical account, rather than detracts from it, and furthermore, similar equivalents confirm and give credibility not only to the theme of the great deluge, but also the Old Testament as a whole. Many sceptics falsely assume that the Sumerian `Flood` pre-dates the Biblical account by thousands of years, thus lending credence to the theory that the former is the authentic version of events, whilst the latter a pale imitation. But this is not the case. As we shall see:

Was The Flood Worldwide?




It is more or less a universally preached dogma in nearly all churches that the Biblical Flood, covered the whole surface of the earth and drowned all living things, excepting Noah, his family and the other creatures who escaped death by being on the Ark. Some churches have firmly insisted that this is the case, when there is ample proof that the `flood` was not world wide.

The Quran, written in the 7th century AD, gives a similar account to that of the Genesis flood story, the major differences being that only Noah and a small number of believers enter the ark. The Quranic flood is purely local, sent to punish those people around Noah who worshipped Idols and became corrupt-ors in the earth. In the Islamic version, Allah sends the Flood to punish those who refuse to listen to Noah's preaching of the oneness of Allah. The Quranic ark comes to rest on Mount Judi, which has been traditionally identified with a mountain near Mosul in modern Iraq. The name appears to derive from the name of the local Kurdish people, although this is not certain.

Returning to the Bible, part of this mistaken idea about the `flood` is due to the many mistranslations found in the King James version. In Genesis Chapter Six, we read that God found the people so corrupt, that he regretted having ever created them, so he determined that he would wipe them out by a flood. He warned righteous Noah of the coming deluge and told him to build a great boat, or ark, in which he and his family might find safety and where they might preserve a few of each kind of the animals from that area. Then in Genesis Chapter Seven, it says:

"And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up and the windows of heaven were opened. And the rain was upon the earth 40 days and 40 nights. And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the waters. And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered. 15 cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl and of cattle, and of beast and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; and every man.

And the waters prevailed upon the earth 150 days. And God remembered Noah and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark; and God made a wind to pass over the earth and the water assuaged. And the waters returned from off the earth continually and after the end of the 150 days the waters were abated. And the ark rested, in the 7th month, on the 17th day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. And the waters decreased continually until the 10th month; in the 10th month, on the 1st day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen." KJV Gen 7:11-

Again there is a discrepancy between the translation and what the `author` originally wrote as the text of the Greek Septuagint confirms. The KJV says that the rain was upon "the earth" and the waters increased greatly upon "the earth," and that "all flesh died that moved upon the earth." But in actuality, the Greek text says something quite different.

In Genesis 4:14, when God drove Cain away in punishment for killing Abel, the KJV has Cain saying, "Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth." But Cain's line is recorded for six whole generations up to the time of the flood, so he can hardly have suffered that fate.

In his article, `Noah's Flood Was Not Worldwide,` Pastor B.L.Comparet goes on to explain that the original Hebrew text read, "ad-aw-maw" meaning "the ground." God had told Cain that his farming days were over, so Cain said, "Thou hast driven me off of the ground."

In Genesis Chapter Seven, where it is talks about the flood, wherever it says that the flood covered "the earth," the Hebrew word used in the original text was `eh-rats,` meaning `the land.` The flood did cover the particular land where it occurred. That is, as the Quran corroborates, it was a local flood which covered one particular region or land, not the entire planet.

Using logic and reason as our basis, if the whole earth was covered by six miles of water as the translators will have us believe, then all nations at that time must have been completely exterminated. Yet Babylonian, Egyptian and Chinese history runs right through this period without a break. The Bible gives the date of the flood as commencing in 2345 B.C. and ending in 2344 B.C. (roughly corresponding to the time frame given in the Sumerian account) In lower Sumer, later called `Chaldea` (which occupied the same `Plains of Shinar` to which Noah's family journeyed after the flood), the city of Ur of the Chaldees was the pre-eminent `metropolis` from about 2400 B.C. until about 2285 B.C. and its history is not broken by any flood during this period.

Further north, Babylon was rising to power from about 2400 B.C. and reached a great height of civilization under the famous King Hammurabi, who lived at the same time as the Hebrew patriarch Abraham (about 2250 B.C.), and again there is no break in this history due to a flood either. In Egypt, the Eleventh Dynasty began to reign about 2375 B.C. `over a great and powerful nation.` The Eleventh Dynasty ruled to about 2212 B.C., and was followed by the Twelfth Dynasty, which ruled to about 2000 B.C.. There was no break in the Eleventh Dynasty at the time of Noah's flood, 2345 B.C.. The nation continued to be large and powerful throughout this period.

Accurate history of China begins around 3000 B.C. The `Shu-King` historic record of China, shows that King Yao came to the throne in 2356 B.C., 11 years before the start of Noah's flood, and ruled China for many years after the flood. During his reign, the `Shu King` reports that the Hwang Ho River (which drains mountains and a great basin in Sinkiang province) had excessive floods for three generations. Here again, there was no break in history. The Chinese nation was not wiped out. Its own records show that it continued in existence right through the period of Noah's flood.

Tracing Footsteps:

To identify the location of the deluge, we will have to start with Adam and Eve and trace where they and their descendants went. Pastor Comparet in his article tracks their movements beginning with their departure from Eden:

"When Adam and Eve were driven out of the Garden of Eden, Genesis 3:24, tells us that God placed cherubim with a flaming sword at the east side of the Garden, to keep Adam and Eve from returning and having access to the `tree of life.` If this guard was to accomplish anything, it must have been placed between Adam and the Garden of Eden. So we see that Adam and Eve were driven out to the east. From Eden, Adam's course would naturally have led him across northern Iran, around the southern end of the Caspian Sea, into what was formerly called Chinese Turkistan and today is known as Sinkiang province in the extreme west of China. It was here , in a mountain rimmed basin, which was then a fertile and well populated land, that Adam and Eve, or at least their descendants of a few generations later, settled."

When Cain murdered Abel, and was banished from the land where Adam and Eve lived, Genesis 4:16 tells us that Cain "went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the Land of Nod, on the east of Eden." The Hebrew word `nod` means wandering. That, I would suggest would mean his wandering along the upper Tigris and Euphrates valleys, at the north of Eden[4]. It was here in the land then known as `Sumer,` and later called `Chaldea` that Cain likely settled. The Bible calls it, "the Plain of Shinar." That indicates that Cain travelled westward from where Adam and Eve had settled, (which we will see means he avoided the flood and escaped extermination for himself and his line?)

More evidence can be found in Genesis 11:2, which tells us that following the flood, Noah's descendants "journeyed from the east," until they came to the land of Shinar. Therefore, they must have come from some place east of the Tigris and Euphrates Valleys. Based on topography, the only place where such a flood as the Bible describes could have occurred, eastward from the that location, is the mountain basin in Sinkiang.

In short, the basin, through which flows the Tarim River and which is sometimes known as the Tarim Basin[5] in southern Sinkiang, can be reasonably identified as being the the site of Noah's flood.

But Genesis 8:4, reads, "And the ark rested in the 7th month, on the 17th day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat?" Most understand this to mean Mount Ararat, in Armenia, some 1,600 miles west of the Tarim Basin. But this is NOT what the Bible says. First of all, note that it says "mountains of Ararat," mountains being in the plural, while Mount Ararat, in Armenia, is only a single peak. Furthermore, the Hebrew word `Ararat` means `the tops of the hills.` Therefore correctly translated, Genesis 8:4 actually tells us that the Ark came to rest upon the tops of the high hills, some of the lower mountains which were within the valley.

Adding weight to our thesis that the Biblical Flood was localised, there is no suggestion anywhere in the Epic Of Gilgamesh, that their great deluge was anything other than local.

Survivors Of The Lost Ark:

So having established to a high degree of probability using Biblical, Historical and Geographic rationale, that the flood was not global, and that due to Cain's wandering westwards prior to the great deluge, we can reasonably concur that his line and therefore that of Satan's and the Nephilim survived through his progeny. However, there is a Gnostic version of events which needs examining before we can really begin to understand the dynamics of what is going on here.

There is a suggestion that the `seed` continued from the point of origin of a more unexpected source. The Canonical Scriptures maintain that the only people upon the Ark were Noah, his wife, Shem, Ham, Japheth, and their wives. The question is, was there a descendant of Cain amongst them? Since the Bible tells us that Noah was descended from the line of Seth, Adam's `righteous` son, we need to take a closer look at the others on-board.

In Part One, we concluded that it was likely that the `Sethites` had mixed their blood with those of the Cainites. According to Hebrew Apocryphal texts, the race of the Anakim was continued through the descendants of one of Noah's grandsons; Canaan, the son of Ham. In Genesis 9:20-24 we read:

"20 Now Noah started off as a farmer and proceeded to plant a vineyard. 21 And he began drinking of the wine and became intoxicated, and so he uncovered himself in the midst of his tent. 22 Later Ham the father of Ca´naan saw his father's nakedness and went telling it to his two brothers outside. 23 At that Shem and Ja´pheth took a mantle and put it upon both their shoulders and walked in backwards. Thus they covered their father's nakedness, while their faces were turned away, and they did not see their father's nakedness. 24 Finally Noah awoke from his wine and got to know what his youngest son had done to him. 25 At this he said: "Cursed be Ca´naan. Let him become the lowest slave to his brothers."

To those who do not understand the terms "uncovered" and "the nakedness of his father," in the Biblical sense, it would be helpful to take a look at Leviticus Chapters 18 and 20. These deal with laws forbidding acts of immorality and the penalties for those who have committed any such acts. According to Leviticus 18:8 and 20:11, "A man who lay with his father's wife had `uncovered` his father's nakedness." Read also Deuteronomy 22:30 and 1 Corinthians 5:1.

What Genesis appears to be telling us is that Ham committed incest with his mother, whilst Noah was drunk and lying naked in his tent. Both Ham and Noah's wife were therefore guilty of a perverted sexual act according to the law of Yahweh.

So, when Noah awoke from his wine and became sober, he pronounced a curse upon Ham in the person of his youngest son Canaan. To Ham himself he could do no harm, for God had conferred a blessing upon Noah and his three sons as they departed from the ark. Therefore he put the curse upon the last-born son of the son that had prevented him from fathering a younger son than the three he had.

Certain heretical Jewish texts state that Noah's wife was a Cainite? Again, this is only `myth or legend,` but for the purposes of this hypothesis, it is worth investigating further. In the genealogy of Cain's descendants, a woman by the name of Naamah is mentioned (Genesis 4:22.) In the Bible record of genealogy, women were not mentioned unless they played a significant role in the history of the Hebrew people. So why was she named? Was Naamah the wife of Noah? And if so, that would make her Ham's mother. In his book `The Days Of Noah,` a scholarly compilation of the Books Of Enoch, Jubilees and other Apocrypha, Author Jeremy Knapp writes:

"Unlike Istehar, the pious maiden, Naamah, the lovely sister of Tubal-cain, led the angels astray with her beauty, and from her union with the watcher Shamdon, sprang the devil Asmodeus. She was as shameless as all the other descendants of Cain, and as prone to bestial indulgences. Cainite women and Cainite men alike were in the habit of walking abroad naked, and they gave themselves up to every conceivable manner of lewd practices. Of such were the women whose beauty and sensual charms tempted the angels from the path of virtue. The angels, on the other hand, no sooner had they rebelled against God and descended to Earth than they lost their transcendental qualities, and were invested with sublunary bodies, so that a union with the daughters of men became possible. The offspring of these alliances between the angels and the Cainite women were the giants, known for their strength and their sinfulness; as their very name, the Emim, indicates, they inspired fear. They have many other names. Sometimes they go by the name Rephaim, because one encounter with them makes one's heart grow weak; or by the name Gibborim, simply giants, because their size was so enormous that their thigh measured nearly two ells; or by the name Zamzummim, because they were great masters in war; or by the name Anakim, because they touched the sun with their neck; or by the name Ivvim, because, like the snake, they could judge of the qualities of the soil; or finally, by the name Nephilim, because, bringing the world to its fall, they themselves fell." The Days Of Noah by Jeremy Knapp[6]

If this is the same Naamah, then Ham must have inherited the Satanic Bloodline from her, and it would have been similarly the case with Shem and Japheth. also.
So, we have the righteous Noah (of Seth's lineage) and his Cainite or even hybrid wife, (considering the coupling of the Nephilim with `the daughters of Cain`) who gave birth to three sons of mixed blood. These sons, in turn, very likely would have married Cainite women, or women also of mixed lineage. During that time, as we established in part one, the earth was populated by pre Adamic people who had been corrupted by Satan, before the arrival of Adam and Eve. These, along with the Cainites and the Anakim are the "people who filled the earth with wickedness, evil, and violence" (Genesis 6:1-13).
Evidence of The Anakim After The Flood:

As we proceed to untangle the truth from the web of mistranslations and contradictory mythologies, and having hypothesised that the Satanic line of Cain was almost certainly continued after the flood. We need to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the progeny of the Nephilim survived in order to determine as to whether they live among us today. In order to do so, we must return again to ancient Mesopotamia, and research not only the Biblical texts, but their Sumerian, Akkadian and Babylonian counterparts.

Nimrod: A Mighty Hunter Before The Lord!

We first encounter Nimrod in Genesis 10:8-10; "And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one (first king) in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD."

Nimrod, a descendent of Noah, was responsible for building the city of Babel (Babylon), and he became the founder of Nineveh and other great cities in Assyria. He distinguished himself as a hunter, ruler, and builder. He lived for an undetermined amount of centuries after the Flood, and was the grandson of Ham. Said to be a bold man, and of great strength of hand . He persuaded men not to ascribe to God, in order to bring them into a constant dependence upon his own power (shades of the ungodly modern secular state). Fearful of another flood, he swore to build a tower too high for the waters to reach! Thus avenging himself on God for destroying his forefathers!




Tower Of Babel.

In his book, `Cloak Of The Illuminati,` William Henry Writes:

"Many legends have grown up around the name of Nimrod. His name appears to be a title, Nimrod is a Hebrew term. Nimrod was born in Sumeria, c. 2250 BC. Consequently, his birth name would have been Sumerian/Akkadian and not Hebrew. In post-biblical traditions, Nimrod, the inciter of "rebellion" who ruled Babel, was identified as a giant, ( Anunnaki in Sumeria,) equivalent to the Anakim of Deuteronomy, and the Anak of Numbers."He was the chief instigator of the tower of Babel. This was a human revolt or rebellion, which led to building a tower in the course of staging revenge against the Hebrew god Yahweh (the Sumerian god Enlil), lest he flood the world again. The tower was a symbol of worship and protection and became well known by many as the ziggurat of Etemenanki, in honor of the Babylonian supreme god MARDUK; the god of Mars."

More Evidence of Anakim in The Antideluvian Era:

?
According to the Bible, the Israelites were commanded by Yahweh to possess the land of Canaan by literally exterminating the inhabitants. Deuteronomy 9:1-2 reads:

1 "Hear, O Israel, you are today crossing the Jordan to go in and dispossess nations greater and mightier than you, cities great and fortified to the heavens, 2 a people great and tall, the sons of the An´a·kim, about whom you yourself have known and you yourself have heard it said, 'Who can make a firm stand before the sons of A´nak?"

As corroboration of the survival of the Anakim, the historian Josephus observed: "There were still then left a race of giants who had bodies so large, and countenances so different from other men, that they were surprising to the sight and terrible to the hearing."[7]

The Bible Book Of Numbers 13:22, tells us that Moses sent out a reconnaissance mission into Negeb and to Mount Hebron. Whilst there, these ancient equivalents of Israeli Special Forces encountered ` Arba` the son of Anak; founder of the city of Kiriath Arba of Hebron. The Israelite spies likened him and his people to the Giants of Genesis 6:4 and possibly the Rephaites. Below are some further examples from the scriptures which clearly indicate that the Anakim and their kind were still evident in the land of Canaan long after the Flood:

Emites: Were the original inhabitants of Moab. A powerful advanced civilization who were also tall of stature, so that they were, like the Anakim, called Giants.

Rephaites, Rephaim: The name of a giant people (Gen. 14:5; 15:20), who lived in Canaan before the time of Abram. They were said to be like the Anakim (Deut. 2:11, 20). Og the Amorite king of Bashan, was a descendant of the Rephaites (Josh. 12:4; 13:12). The last king of the race, he was defeated and killed by the Israelites at Edrei in the time of Moses (Num 21:33-35; Deut 3:1-7). His sarcophagus of iron (black basaltic rock) was recorded as being nearly fourteen feet long and six feet wide, which was said to be from Rabbath-Ammon (Ammonite), today Amman, capital of Jordan.

Zamzummite, Zamzummim: Described as "a people strong, numerous, and ...tall" (Deut. 2:21). They were the race of giants called the Rephaim (2 Sam 5:18, 22), who lived east of the River Jordan.

Anakim: Remnants of the Anakim remained in Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod and were still present during the days of Joshua (1500-1390 B.C.) as witnessed in the Book Of Joshua 11:21:

"And at that time came Joshua, and he cut off the Anakims from the mountains, from Hebron, from Debir, from Anab, from all the mountains of Judah, and from all the mountains of Israel: Joshua destroyed them utterly with their cities." 11:22 "There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained (remnants)."

Joshua's battle to annihilate the Anakim from the land set the stage for future events. David was the second king of Judah and Israel between 1010-962 B.C., The Bible tells of his vanquishing of the Philistine giant Goliath, who was said to be between nine and eleven feet tall, depending on the length of a cubit, and probably of the Anakites. (Num. 13:33; Josh 11:22.)

The book of Samuel (2 Samuel 21:15-20.) also tells of other Rephaim. David and his men also killed three of them besides Goliath. These were:

Benob whose spear weighed three hundred shekels;

Saph a Philistine giant, of the race of Rapha.

Sippai in 1 Chron 20:4, who died in the battle of Gob; He was the brother of Goliath, and the Gittite of Gath, a phenomenal man whose name is not given "a giant with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, twenty-four in all."

Yahweh intended to utterly destroy the seed of Cain and that of the Anakim once and for all. But his `chosen people,` just wouldn't listen, and down through the ages since, humanity has suffered terribly, and continues to do so because of that disobedience to the creator's word.

So the Satanic Bloodline continued:

In Part Three, we will conclude the series by tracing the `Bloodline` to the present day, and finally identify who or what truly rules our world, and here's a clue, it isn't the President Of The United States.

You can leave a comment here:
http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_
content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43

and here: http://www.nylonmanden.dk/index.php?option=com_
content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=43

1] The Book Of Jubilees : http://www.scribd.com/doc/2227992/The-Book-of-
Jubilees-Revised-English?autodown=pdf

2] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/index.htm

3] http://history-world.org/sumerian_floor_story.htm

4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_of_eden

5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_Basin

6] http://www.scribd.com/doc/2546074/The-Days-of-Noah

7] http://www.scribd.com/doc/13040295/The-Complete-Works-of-Josephus

Essential Reading : `Terrorism And The Illuminati` by David Livingstone : http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/book/toc.html

sitfu.com
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Mainstream Media
Posted on 9:44 PM by x and filed under , , | 1 Comments »

1 Comments:

Anonymous said... @ July 15, 2009 at 1:33 PM

I have the following comments;
(a)The fallen angels went on to the daughters of men and produced giants.This is so sexist,all the fallen angels were only men no women.Yet God created both man and woman in his image.Imagine God creating only beautiful women and No Handsome men.Note when God was refering sons of God (JOB) he was referring to Angels and in the New Testament Sons of god are reference to men who have become spiritual masters example 144,000 .Refer to Romans 8:19....
(b)If the flood only was in one region of the earth,why go through the trouble of building and Ark.Why not travel to the region where the flood is not taking place...Let us not forget Romans 8:20 stipulates the whole of creation is mourning and wants to be redeemed.Hence both humans and earth were cursed,so God would not restrict the flood to one region of the earth.
(c) Ancient Sumeria and China have calender dates differing from the Bibical could mean(1) one of the calenders is wrong (2)They count from different points in their respective history example Mayan calender ,Hindu calender western calender etc. all have different starting points.
(d)Present day History we have little people (midgets) and really tall people (giants).Why then can't we have giants in those days both before and after the flood and they are humans...
(e)My Opinion on fallen angels,they are literal created beings. Lucifer is a musician,why can't other angels be masters in astrolgy,science etc.now let us not forget adam named plants and animals (genesis).The human heart is evil,deceitful( Genesis,Jeremiah).Christ in you that perfect his righteous in you.Lucifer imitates Christ, example Lucifer is described as a snake yet Moses held up a Rod with a snake to free the people of Isarel who were being bitten in the wilderness and those who looked at it were saved.Note humans want to be God and they are created in the image of god..
Concludes,the following Humans heart is evil,they want to be god,the fallen angels like Christ can posses a human spirit.Humans that were might men of old were not (Human/angels) but literally humans who were possesed by spirits(fallen angels) and those humans who were actually walking in the spirit of God (Enoch)
(f) Remember Lucifer has given his seat and authority to a man.Imagine the depths of that wickedness of those humans.

Post a Comment

Archive